Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/8108
Registro completo de metadados
Campo Dublin CoreValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Vanessa Rios de-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Patrícia Aparecida Pimenta-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Ana Carla Marques-
dc.contributor.authorBolini, Helena Maria André-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Soraia Vilela-
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Fabiana-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-28T14:24:24Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-28T14:24:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationSOUZA, V. R. de et al. Analysis of various sweeteners in low-sugar mixed fruit jam: equivalent sweetness, time-intensity analysis and acceptance test. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, v. 48, p. 1541–1548, 2013. Disponível em:<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.12123/abstract> . Acesso em: 16 jun. 2017.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1365-2621-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/8108-
dc.description.abstractFor a sweetener to successfully replace sucrose in food formulations, studies must first be conducted to determine the concentrations of the sweeteners to be used and their equivalent sweetness compared with sucrose. After establishing the optimal concentration of each sweetener, it is necessary to determine which is more similar to sucrose. The objective of this study was to determine the equivalent amount of different sweeteners, necessary to promote the same degree of ideal sweetness in mixed fruit (marolo, sweet passion fruit and soursop) jam and to characterise the time–intensity profile and consumer acceptance. With respect to the mixed fruit jam containing 40% (w/w) of sucrose, sucralose presented the highest sweetening power, being 1033.59 times sweeter than sucrose, followed by sucralose/acesulfame-K/neotame 5:3:0.1 (982.80), sucralose/steviol glycoside 2:1 (862.67), sucralose/acesulfame-K 3:1 (847.45) and sucralose/thaumatin 1:0.6 (284.29). The sweeteners had a time–intensity sweetness profile similar to sucrose and a time– intensity bitterness profile different from sucrose but similar among themselves. In relation to sensory acceptance, a significant difference between the low-sugar jam and the traditional jam was not observed.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.rightsrestritopt_BR
dc.subjectEquivalent sweetnesspt_BR
dc.subjectMixed fruit jampt_BR
dc.subjectTime–intensitypt_BR
dc.subjectSweetenerspt_BR
dc.titleAnalysis of various sweeteners in low-sugar mixed fruit jam : equivalent sweetness, time-intensity analysis and acceptance test.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo publicado em periodicopt_BR
dc.identifier.uri2http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.12123/abstractpt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12123-
Aparece nas coleções:DEALI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_AnalysisVariousSweetners.pdf
  Restricted Access
714,73 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.