Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15953
Título: Mapping the tuberculosis scientific landscape among BRICS countries : a bibliometric and network analysis.
Autor(es): Castor, Kamaiaji
Mota, Fabio Batista
Silva, Roseli Monteiro da
Cabral, Bernardo Pereira
Maciel, Ethel Leonor
Almeida, Isabela Neves de
Arakaki Sanchez, Denise
Andrade, Kleydson Bonfim
Testov, Vadim
Vasilyeva, Irina
Zhao, Yanlin
Zhang, Hui
Singh, Manjula
Rao, Raghuram
Tripathy, Srikanth
Gray, Glenda
Padayatchi, Nesri
Bhagwandin, Niresh
Swaminathan, Soumya
Kasaeva, Tereza
Kritski, Afranio Lineu
Palavras-chave: Research network analysis
Data do documento: 2020
Referência: CASTROR, K. et al. Mapping the tuberculosis scientific landscape among BRICS countries: a bibliometric and network analysis. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, v. 115, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.scielo.br/j/mioc/a/jSphGQ6rCDhMXD5f8gdX6Dm/?lang=en>. Acesso em: 11 out. 2022.
Resumo: BACKGROUND The five BRICS (Brazil, Russian, Indian, China, and South Africa) countries bear 49% of the world’s tuberculosis (TB) burden and they are committed to ending tuberculosis. OBJECTIVES The aim of this paper is to map the scientific landscape related to TB research in BRICS countries. METHODS Were combined bibliometrics and social network analysis techniques to map the scientific publications related to TB produced by the BRICS. Was made a descriptive statistical data covering the full period of analysis (1993-2016) and the research networks were made for 2007-2016 (8,366 records). The bubble charts were generated by VantagePoint and the networks by the Gephi 0.9.1 software (Gephi Consortium 2010) from co-occurrence matrices produced in VantagePoint. The Fruchterman- Reingold algorithm provided the networks’ layout. FINDINGS During the period 1993-2016, there were 38,315 peer-reviewed, among them, there were 11,018 (28.7%) articles related by one or more authors in a BRICS: India 38.7%; China 23.8%; South Africa 21.1%; Brazil 13.0%; and Russia 4.5% (The total was greater than 100% because our criterion was all papers with at least one author in a BRICS). Among the BRICS, there was greater interaction between India and South Africa and organisations in India and China had the highest productivity; however, South African organisations had more interaction with countries outside the BRICS. Publications by and about BRICS generally covered all research areas, especially those in India and China covered all research areas, although Brazil and South Africa prioritised infectious diseases, microbiology, and the respiratory system. MAIN CONCLUSIONS An overview of BRICS scientific publications and interactions highlighted the necessity to develop a BRICS TB research plan to increase efforts and funding to ensure that basic science research successfully translates into products and policies to help end the TB epidemic.
URI: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15953
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760190342
ISSN: 1678-8060
Licença: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license. Fonte: o PDF do artigo.
Aparece nas coleções:DEACL - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_MappingTuberculosisScientific.pdf3,81 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.