Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12158
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Caroline Priscila Fan-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Tomás Barros-
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T19:51:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T19:51:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationROCHA, C. P. F.; RAMOS, T. B.; FONSECA, A. de F. C. Manufacturing pre-decisions: a comparative analysis of environmental impact statement (EIS) reviews in Brazil and Portugal. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 2, p. 3235, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3235>. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/12158-
dc.description.abstractThe review of environmental impact statements (EIS), despite its relevance to impact assessment effectiveness, has received scarce scholarly attention. Few studies have gone beyond the realm of regulatory evaluations to understand the managerial meanders of the review process. This study evaluated the responsibilities, procedures, information inputs, and scope of EIS reviews within two environmental authorities: APA (Portuguese Environment Agency), in Portugal, and SEMAD (State Secretariat for Environment and Sustainable Development), in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais. Based on a qualitative multiple-case study methodology informed by participant observation, unstructured interviews, and content analysis of 12 EIS review reports, the study provided what is arguably one of the most detailed characterizations of EIS review to date. While following similar institutional arrangements and broad procedural steps, the EIS review has important differences in APA and SEMAD. Overall, the Portuguese agency was found to have a more structured, participative, interdisciplinary, detailed, and grounded review, thus meeting some of the good practices often cited in the literature. The EIS review reports prepared by APA reviewers were also found to provide a profoundly more complete and transparent account of the review process. The details of the review process revealed in the article can affect perceptions around the legitimacy and reliability of reviewers’ recommendations.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.rightsabertopt_BR
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact assessment - EIApt_BR
dc.subjectReview stagept_BR
dc.subjectPublic administrationpt_BR
dc.titleManufacturing pre-decisions : a comparative analysis of environmental impact statement (EIS) reviews in Brazil and Portugal.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo publicado em periodicopt_BR
dc.rights.licenseThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Fonte: o próprio artigo.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11123235pt_BR
Appears in Collections:DEAMB - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_ManufacturingPreDecisions.pdf1,13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.